CO129-227 - Acting Governor Marsh - 1886 [6] — Page 378

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

376

Sir

Sue R. Herbert.

T

The question raised is whether Mr Marsh can have a pension based on his final salary for his whole term of Service. Mauritius and Hongkong being treated as one Scheme, he can be given this.

The colony charter he must (Act of 1869): the question is whether there should be two separate pensions according to the salaries drawn in the two colonies.

This is under the Scheme of 1870!

Under the former case he would of course get much more than in the latter. His case is not parallel to Sir C. Smith's: Sir C. Smith was refused the benefit of the 1869 Scheme because he was moved from Hongkong where it had been adopted though not finally approved, to the Straits

Edit History

2026-05-25 00:08:10 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
376 Sir Sue R. Herbert. T The question raised is whether Mr Marsh can have a pension based on his final salary for his whole term of Service. Mauritius and Hongkong being treated as one Scheme, he can be given this. The colony charter he must (Act of 1869): the question is whether there should be two separate pensions according to the salaries drawn in the two colonies. This is under the Scheme of 1870! Under the former case he would of course get much more than in the latter. His case is not parallel to Sir C. Smith's: Sir C. Smith was refused the benefit of the 1869 Scheme because he was moved from Hongkong where it had been adopted though not finally approved, to the Straits
Baseline (Original)
376 Siz Sue R. Herbert. T The question raised is whether Mi Marsh can have a pension based on his final salary for his whole team of Savice. Mauritius and Hongtong being treated as one Scheme be given This colony chatter he must f. 1869.): : of whether two separate pensions according to the salaries drawn in the two colonies. | This is the Scheme of 1870! Under the get former case he would of counse much more than in the latter. His case is not parallel to Sir C. Smithe: Sir C. Smith was refused the benefi of the 1869 Scheme because he was moved from Hongkong Where it had been adopted though not finally approved, to the Straits
2026-05-25 00:08:10 · Baseline
View content

376

Siz

Sue R. Herbert.

T

The question raised is whether Mi Marsh can have a pension based on his final salary for his whole team of Savice. Mauritius and Hongtong being

treated as one

Scheme

be

given

This

colony chatter he must

f. 1869.):

: of whether

two separate pensions according

to the salaries drawn in the two colonies.

| This is the Scheme of 1870!

Under the

get

former

case he would of

counse

much more than in the latter. His case is not parallel to Sir C. Smithe: Sir C. Smith was refused the benefi of the 1869 Scheme because he was moved from Hongkong Where it had been adopted though not finally approved, to the Straits

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.